Canada’s Future w/ @govt_corrupt & Greg Wycliffe
Debating Federalism, the Monarchy & a Vision for Canada
Date & Time
Sunday, February 9th
Live at 2 PM MT (4 PM ET)
Livestream
Watch on The Lavigne Show Live on Locals, X, Rumble, Facebook, and more.
Join The Lavigne Show for an exciting conversation on Canada’s political landscape and future. Our guests—@govt_corrupt, a self-described anarcho-capitalist, and Greg Wycliffe @gddub, a populist advocate—will tackle fundamental questions about Canada’s government, personal freedoms, and the role of the monarchy in the modern era.
What to Expect
Federal Government: Why Bother?
@govt_corrupt challenges the need for a federal system, arguing for radical reductions in government size—or even dismantling it. Learn how personal experiences with ostracism during the health crisis fueled his call for non-compliance and minimal governance.
Monarchy & Westminster System
Both guests critique Canada’s historical governance framework, posing hard questions: Do Canadians still benefit from the monarchy and a Westminster parliamentary model, or do these institutions perpetuate inequality and hinder real progress?
Populism vs. Anarcho-Capitalism
Hear the differences between Greg Wycliffe’s vision for a populist shift aligning with the People’s Party of Canada values—such as free speech and national identity—and @govt_corrupt’s anarcho-capitalist approach to minimizing or removing state influence.
Free Speech & Public Dissent
With both guests voicing strong concerns about censorship and an “erosion of freedoms,” we’ll explore how Canadians can reclaim their rights—whether through political involvement, grassroots activism, or walking away from the system entirely.
Why You Should Watch
Bold Perspectives
Encounter two compelling viewpoints about Canada’s political future—one aimed at reforming structures from within, the other at dismantling them entirely.
Real-life Accountability
Hear personal stories about ostracism, activism, and how Canadians might respond to “non-compliant” or “protest” stances against perceived government overreach.
Think Beyond the Status Quo
Whether you’re a monarchist, a proponent of strong populism, or a believer in smaller government, this conversation promises fresh insights into Canada's future.
Upgrade to Supporter!
Choose our annual membership at $70 USD\$100 CAD and enjoy two months free, or opt for a monthly plan starting at just $7 USD\$10 CAD. You’ll unlock full, uncensored daily live streams, interactive Q&A sessions with special guests, and exclusive behind-the-scenes content—all while fueling independent Canadian journalism. If you can afford to give more, you can always increase your support, helping us expose essential stories and hold those in power accountable.
Hi all,
So sorry to say, but just for today, we have a sick Jay.
The cold started Wednesday, and on the drive yesterday, it got worse.
As a result, no Tea & Coffee this morning.
I'll recover and we'll see you Monday.
God bless.
Strong-Mayor Powers, Media Pressure, and What Ontario Should Learn from Alberta
Wednesday, August 13 at 7 PM MT / 9 PM ET
YouTube · Rumble · X · Facebook · TheLavigneShow.com
Pickering Councillor Lisa Robinson joins Jason Lavigne for a frank discussion about municipal overreach in Ontario and why Albertans should care. From “strong-mayor” powers and integrity-commissioner sanctions to media narratives and election integrity, Robinson lays out how local governance can drift away from democratic accountability, and what Alberta can do differently as it debates self-determination.
In this episode:
- What “strong-mayor” powers mean on the ground—and why they matter to Alberta
- Integrity commissioners, year-long pay sanctions, and the chilling effect on dissent
- Media pressure vs. balanced reporting
- Electronic vs. paper ballots, voter ID, and safeguarding elections
- Border security, provincial jurisdiction, and the stakes of an Alberta referendum
- How an Alberta ...
Come and experience the electrifying energy of The Lavigne Show Live right here in Ottawa!
Join us at the Days Inn by Wyndham Ottawa for an afternoon of interviews with David Krayden and Lisa Robinson.
This in-person event is your chance to see The Lavigne Show up close and personal. Don't miss out on this incredible experience!
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-lavigne-show-live-ottawa-tickets-1442298155609
Enjoy the Conversation on Alberta Independence with Jeffrey Rath & Chris Scott — From the Live event in Drayton Valley!
Whistle Stop Cafe's Chris Scott and Alberta lawyer Jeffrey Rath, whose fiery new piece “ALBERTA WANTS OUT! An Open Letter to Danielle Smith” is sparking province-wide debate, were on stage for an uncensored, audience-driven discussion about whether Alberta should chart its course.
What’s in the Letter & Why It Matters
Leadership at a Crossroads: Rath says Premier Smith must remove Kenney-era ministers implicated in pandemic misfeasance or risk losing Albertans’ trust.
COVID Accountability Gap: There has been no public inquiry, no retroactive help for shuttered businesses, and no action on vaccine injury concerns.
“Team Alberta,” Not “Team Canada”: He slams Ottawa’s 25 % retaliatory tariffs and Smith’s support for making everything from trucks to tomatoes pricier in Alberta.
20 Reasons to Go It Alone: From axing federal taxes and ...
Throughout Canada’s modern era, one guiding truth has held constant for many citizens of faith: that our fundamental rights and freedoms originate from a higher authority—God—rather than mere privileges granted by government or courts. When the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was introduced in 1982, the drafters inserted a crucial statement at the very outset:
“Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: …”
According to former Newfoundland Premier Brian Peckford, the last living signatory to the Charter, this statement, followed by a colon, was deliberately designed to be read before each section of the Charter. It was not a ceremonial “preamble” but a constant framing principle, meant to remind legislators, judges, and citizens alike that the Charter’s rights have a transcendent source. The supremacy of God was intended to inform and contextualize all subsequent articles, rather than be relegated to symbolic status or ignored altogether.
Over time, ...
