Preston Manning’s recent warning that a Mark Carney Liberal victory would “spark Western secession” strikes a chord in Alberta, where many feel that federal policies have sidelined resource-based interests for far too long. His statement, “a vote for the Carney Liberals is a vote for Western secession – a vote for the breakup of Canada as we know it”, reflects growing Western frustration.
Unsurprisingly, the Uniparty closed ranks in response. Mark Carney framed Manning’s concerns as “unhelpful,” insisting that “this is a time when we need to come together as a country.” More startling, however, is Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, whose party traces its roots back to Manning’s Reform, echoing Carney’s sentiment. Poilievre declared in response to Manning, “No, we need to unite the country … We need to bring all Canadians together in a spirit of common ground.”
By siding with Carney over Manning, Poilievre has once again turned his back on Alberta, conservatives, and the expressed will of Westerners. This choice cements him as a weak CINO (Conservative in Name Only), aligning himself with the Uniparty machine rather than the foundational principles of his own party’s predecessors.
In contrast, on April 3rd, People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier took a clear stand, pledging to support the people's will, especially if Albertans choose to pursue independence. Bernier has also encouraged the efforts of provincial independence parties and promised federal-level support for Albertans’ concerns.
It’s time for real change, real reform, and an alternative to the Uniparty. Vote PPC.
Join us and let your voice be heard.
God bless.
Sources:
Mark Carney poses a threat to national unity
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-mark-carney-is-a-threat-to-national-unity/
Carney calls Manning’s comments about Western separatism unhelpful
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-carney-calls-mannings-comments-about-western-separatism-unhelpful/
Poilievre distances himself from ex-Reform Leader Preston Manning’s comments on Western separatism
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-poilievre-distances-himself-from-ex-reform-leader-preston-mannings/
Maxime Bernier will respect the will of Albertans, should they wish to secede
https://x.com/FergHodgson/status/1907948051873902850
Upgrade to Supporter!
Choose our annual membership at $70 USD\$100 CAD and enjoy two months free, or opt for a monthly plan starting at just $7 USD\$10 CAD. You’ll unlock full, uncensored daily live streams, interactive Q&A sessions with special guests, and exclusive behind-the-scenes content—all while fueling independent Canadian journalism. If you can afford to give more, you can always increase your support, helping us expose essential stories and hold those in power accountable.
Hi all,
So sorry to say, but just for today, we have a sick Jay.
The cold started Wednesday, and on the drive yesterday, it got worse.
As a result, no Tea & Coffee this morning.
I'll recover and we'll see you Monday.
God bless.
Strong-Mayor Powers, Media Pressure, and What Ontario Should Learn from Alberta
Wednesday, August 13 at 7 PM MT / 9 PM ET
YouTube · Rumble · X · Facebook · TheLavigneShow.com
Pickering Councillor Lisa Robinson joins Jason Lavigne for a frank discussion about municipal overreach in Ontario and why Albertans should care. From “strong-mayor” powers and integrity-commissioner sanctions to media narratives and election integrity, Robinson lays out how local governance can drift away from democratic accountability, and what Alberta can do differently as it debates self-determination.
In this episode:
- What “strong-mayor” powers mean on the ground—and why they matter to Alberta
- Integrity commissioners, year-long pay sanctions, and the chilling effect on dissent
- Media pressure vs. balanced reporting
- Electronic vs. paper ballots, voter ID, and safeguarding elections
- Border security, provincial jurisdiction, and the stakes of an Alberta referendum
- How an Alberta ...
Come and experience the electrifying energy of The Lavigne Show Live right here in Ottawa!
Join us at the Days Inn by Wyndham Ottawa for an afternoon of interviews with David Krayden and Lisa Robinson.
This in-person event is your chance to see The Lavigne Show up close and personal. Don't miss out on this incredible experience!
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-lavigne-show-live-ottawa-tickets-1442298155609
Enjoy the Conversation on Alberta Independence with Jeffrey Rath & Chris Scott — From the Live event in Drayton Valley!
Whistle Stop Cafe's Chris Scott and Alberta lawyer Jeffrey Rath, whose fiery new piece “ALBERTA WANTS OUT! An Open Letter to Danielle Smith” is sparking province-wide debate, were on stage for an uncensored, audience-driven discussion about whether Alberta should chart its course.
What’s in the Letter & Why It Matters
Leadership at a Crossroads: Rath says Premier Smith must remove Kenney-era ministers implicated in pandemic misfeasance or risk losing Albertans’ trust.
COVID Accountability Gap: There has been no public inquiry, no retroactive help for shuttered businesses, and no action on vaccine injury concerns.
“Team Alberta,” Not “Team Canada”: He slams Ottawa’s 25 % retaliatory tariffs and Smith’s support for making everything from trucks to tomatoes pricier in Alberta.
20 Reasons to Go It Alone: From axing federal taxes and ...
Throughout Canada’s modern era, one guiding truth has held constant for many citizens of faith: that our fundamental rights and freedoms originate from a higher authority—God—rather than mere privileges granted by government or courts. When the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was introduced in 1982, the drafters inserted a crucial statement at the very outset:
“Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: …”
According to former Newfoundland Premier Brian Peckford, the last living signatory to the Charter, this statement, followed by a colon, was deliberately designed to be read before each section of the Charter. It was not a ceremonial “preamble” but a constant framing principle, meant to remind legislators, judges, and citizens alike that the Charter’s rights have a transcendent source. The supremacy of God was intended to inform and contextualize all subsequent articles, rather than be relegated to symbolic status or ignored altogether.
Over time, ...
